Thursday, June 01, 2006

Sacramento Bee: Simmons blasted over political use of College Campus

Simmons' use of Sierra College in TV spot has some on campus seeing an ethical, policy breach.
By Niesha Lofing -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:01 am PDT Thursday, June 1, 2006

In the latest battle in the war for the District 2 seat on the Placer County Board of Supervisors -- candidate Jerry Simmons has come under fire for taping part of a political advertisement on the Sierra College campus.

Several faculty and staff members at the college -- where Simmons is president of the Sierra Joint Community College District's board of trustees -- are upset by what they say are Simmons' unethical actions and violations of campus policy by using the campus in his television spot.

Simmons defends his ad, however, saying that his use of the campus was not improper and is an effort by his opponent, Supervisor Robert Weygandt, to "attempt to distract from the real issues of the campaign."
"This complaint is merely intended to distract the voters from Robert Wey-gandt's terrible record as a supervisor," Simmons said.

The dispute is the latest in the race for the District 2 supervisorial seat and yet another in controversies swirling around Simmons on the college campus.

On Tuesday, a group of local officials filed a notice of intention to recall board of trustee members Simmons and Aaron Klein, based on claims that the two "wasted money, damaged the college's reputation and demoralized faculty, staff and administration," states a news release that names Rocklin Mayor George Magnuson and former Supervisor Rex Bloomfield among the group's leaders.

Simmons also has been criticized in recent weeks by Sierra College faculty and staff for what some call his intimidation of the campus community, and the board is supposed to vote later this month whether to keep Simmons as its president.

A letter to the board by Rebecca Gregg, a photography and applied art and design professor, criticizes Simmons for having taped one of his campaign ads showing the college's library and the Standing Guard Remembrance Garden gate in the background.

The garden is part of a project intended to commemorate the U.S. internment of people of Japanese ancestry during World War II.

Gregg argues in her letter, dated May 15, that by showing portions of the campus, Simmons is trying to imply that he has the support of the college in his quest for county supervisor.

"Since I teach visual communication, I assure you that this is no small matter," Gregg writes. "My students would easily recognize this tactic as a classic visual propaganda technique that, though unspoken, implies endorsement. … "His use of the Garden is appallingly insensitive and wrong."

Gregg, along with other faculty and staff, also is quick to point out that Simmons did not go through proper channels to get permission to film the ad on campus.

Sue Michaels, Sierra College spokeswoman, said anyone wishing to use the campus for filming purposes -- including use of the grounds -- must file a facilities request with the operations department 10 days in advance.

If the request is approved, a fee may be assessed, she said.

"(Simmons) did not put in a request with operations," Michaels said.

Historically, the district has not allowed the filming of political commercials, Michaels said.

"It's very important that we don't appear to do any kind of campaigning," she said. "To come out and support one candidate as opposed to another would be inappropriate for us."

Using the campus for political campaigning also is prohibited under board policy.

Board policy states that "No trustee shall use or permit others to use public resources, except that which is incidental or minimal, for personal purposes or any other purpose not authorized by law."

The government code relevant to that board policy also states that it is "unlawful for any elected state or local officer … to use or permit others to use public resources for a campaign activity," and further defines public resources as including land, buildings and facilities.

In the past 20 years, there have been no other political commercials filmed on campus, Michaels said, adding that "voter registration is the only non-advocacy political activity allowed on campus."

Simmons said he thinks the tumult over his taping part of his ad on campus is "ridiculous."

"I think the core and central point is that at no point did I use taxpayer time, equipment or personnel in the filming or production of the campaign ad," he said. "I think it's clear under (the government code relevant to the board policy) that the use was incidental in nature."

Others, however, disagree.

"It's an absolute violation of not only college policy, but ethics," said Joe Medeiros, a Sierra College biology professor. "This is a horrific ethical lapse of integrity."

Anthony Maki Gill, Classified Senate president, said many at the college are "aghast" that Simmons would not only tape a political commercial on campus without permission, but use the Standing Guard Remembrance Garden in the background.

"I think that is a pretty obvious example of Simmons' lack of sensitivity," Gill said. "I can only imagine the damage that he could wreak if he could dupe the public into believing he's the candidate they should elect."

Simmons pointed out that Weygandt's television ads also feature public property -- Rocklin and Lincoln city halls are both shown in the background.

Weygandt said his campaign representatives sought, and obtained, a permit to tape in Lincoln, and had the permission of the mayor and City Council in Rocklin.

Weygandt said he doesn't mind that he sought official permission to tape his ads, while Simmons did not.

"It doesn't bother me in that regard, but it is consistent with the way he is running his campaign," Weygandt said.

4 Comments:

At June 01, 2006 9:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Simmons' use of college garden is wrong
Rebecca Gregg, Carmichael

Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:06 PM PDT

Jerry Simmons led the attacks on Kevin Ramirez that eventually cost the college (and taxpayers) over $600,000 and Ramirez his job. In my 38 years on the faculty, Simmons' use of the college for his personal ambition, questionable methods and rhetorical double-speak is without parallel.

The Placer County grand jury vindicated Ramirez and urged that the board apologize for unfounded accusations which damaged Ramirez's and the college's reputation. Instead of apologizing, some on the Board have accused the grand jury of political maneuvering. Simmons claims that the outpouring of sentiment at the last board meeting in support of employees threatened by Simmons' behavior was "politically motivated."

Yet it is Mr. Simmons himself who has repeatedly used his position on the board as a rung in his political ladder. He publicly and falsely attributes the achievements of students to be a part of his plan and actions as the "turn-around architect" of Sierra College.

Now he has taped a political advertisement on the campus showing the library in one scene and the distinctive Standing Guard Remembrance garden gate in another. Again, it is he who has brought partisan politics to the campus. Simmons makes much of using government e-mail for political campaigning, but feels strangely justified in using the Rocklin campus as visual backdrop for his political campaign. This blatant misrepresentation is outrageous. Simmons did not even go through the usual process for using campus facilities that all others must follow.

As coordinator of the Standing Guard Project, which sought to recognize those Japanese-American citizens of our community who were forcibly interned when the Constitution was callously ignored, I object to Mr. Simmons' misleading images of approval and success using the college setting for his own political ends.

His misuse of the garden is appallingly insensitive and wrong.

 
At June 01, 2006 9:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't let developer decide District 2 supervisor
Peter Hill, Rocklin City Council

Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:06 PM PDT

On June 6, the most important election in 30 years for District 2 Supervisor will take place.

Will voters in Rocklin and Lincoln re-elect Robert Weygandt, an experienced and thoughtful supervisor? Or will an inexperienced newcomer who has a history of causing chaos and dissension at Sierra College be elected?

I have worked with Robert Weygandt for almost 12 years. As our supervisor, Robert has taken the time to meet with me and other members of the Rocklin City Council every month to discuss issues affecting the city and the county.

I have served with him on a number of committees, including the county air pollution control board and the Highway 65 Funding authority and found him to be deeply concerned about clean air and improving our transportation system. He has also led the effort to make developers set aside open space, pay for their impacts and follow the rules.

Make no mistakes, one large Sacramento developer doesn't like that and wants Robert Weygandt replaced. He wants someone with no experience in land-use issues who won't stand up to him.

Don't let a Sacramento developer decide who our supervisor is, vote to re-elect Robert Weygandt as our supervisor.

 
At June 01, 2006 9:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re-elect Robert Weygandt as supervisor
John Young, Rocklin
Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:06 PM PDT

During Jerry Simmons' reign as Sierra College Board of Trustees president, he masterminded the "resignation" of Kevin Ramirez, who laughed all the way to the bank with his nearly $600,000 cost to the taxpayer settlement.

Now Simmons is trying to sneak through a $100 million bond issue to pay for repair and maintenance expenses at the college. These repair and maintenance expenses should have been performed utilizing funds from the annual operating budgets.

Bonds are designed to be used to pay for long lived capital assets not cover up the fiscal failings of a Board of Trustees. While all this taking place, the professional staff at Sierra College is ready to revolt due to Mr. Simmons' sneaky behind the scenes mirco-management and attempted suspension of the First Amendment.

Now he wants to replace Supervisor Robert Weygandt who has been an excellent supervisor for nearly 12 years. What does Mr. Simmons bring to the party? He is a narrowly focused lawyer who has never even managed a two-person law office nor has he ever managed even a department of a business.

Basically, he is trying to con the voters into electing an inexperienced management trainee who will learn on the job. Based upon his track record at Sierra College, the voters cannot afford to make a mistake of this magnitude. Re-elect Robert Weygandt supervisor.

 
At June 01, 2006 9:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leadership requires integrity, honesty
Rev. Emil Augustine, Lincoln

Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:06 PM PDT

It is time to take a more serious look at the issues that have created such upheaval at Sierra College.

The "gang of three" that have received so much notoriety in the public debate that centers on what is good for Sierra College need to be examined with the same intensity that they applied to the previous administration. The facts are that the two new board members could hardly have made the impact and exerted as much influence without the support of the board chairman, Jerry Simmons.

When all is revealed, it will show that Jerry Simmons was the power broker that enabled this process to reach the present difficult situation. All this needs to be said because Jerry Simmons is running for public office here in Placer County. With this history, how can we trust a person who has used his influence so destructively?

In the next few months, the voters need to filter out the high-powered, slick, self-serving mailings that will only distort the facts as they exist. It is time to recognize that above all, leadership requires integrity and honesty, qualities that are hardly found in the debate among these principles, "the gang of three," at Sierra College.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home